Tekchand @ Titu v. State (Govt, NCT Of Delhi)

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2392/2016 TEKCHAND @ TITU ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms.Anupriya Yadav, Adv.

versus STATE (GOVT, NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for the State S.I. Vijay Kumar, P.S. Farsh Bazar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 11.07.2017 This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.436/2016, under Sections 308/34 IPC, registered at Police Station- Farsh Bazar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and that he is not required for any custodial investigation. He further submits that the allegations alleged in the FIR are totally false. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition(s), if any, imposed by this Court and prays that the petitioner be granted anticipatory bail.

On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application. He, however, on instructions from the IO admits the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner.

Heard.

Perused.

Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in the event of his arrest, the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO concerned with the condition that he shall not influence the prosecution witnesses; he shall not tamper the prosecution evidence; he shall not indulge in any illegal activities; he shall not leave India without prior permission of the concerned Court.

The present bail application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be given dasti.

I.S.MEHTA, J JULY 11, 2017/km