High Court of DelhiMAT.APP.(F.C.)/5/2017

Surveer Singh v. Veena Rawat

2017-12-15Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Siddharth Mridul,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Deepa Sharma1 pages

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 5/2017 & CM No. 1616/2017 SURVEER SINGH ..... Appellant Through:

None.

versus VEENA RAWAT ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. S.P. Rana, Proxy Counsel.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 15.12.2017 There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant at the first call. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant at the second call either. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that parties have arrived at an amicable settlement of the underlying dispute with the intervention of the Mediation Centre at the Karkardooma Court and that the appellant is required to withdraw the present appeal, in terms thereof.

Be that as it may, since none appears on behalf of the appellant, the appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J DEEPA SHARMA, J DECEMBER 15, 2017/js