Varun Puri v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~5 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2428/2016 & CRL.M.A.No.2096/16 VARUN PURI ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Y.Bhalla, Advocate.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Mukesh Kumar, PS Bindapur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 01.05.2017 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.673/2016 registered under Sections 323/379/506/509/354B/34 IPC at PS Binda Pur. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 25.11.2016, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. At first instance, he was to appear before the Investigating Officer on 26.11.2016 at 03.00 p.m. Status report reveals that the petitioner has since joined the investigation. BAIL APPLN. 2428/2016

3.

Complainant's counsel who had put appearance on 25.11.2016 at the time of grant of interim protection was asked to file response to the bail application. The complainant did not opt to contest the bail application. The petitioner and the prosecutrix were acquainted with each other being neighbours.

Nature of injuries sustained by the victim is 'simple'. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record photocopy of the MOU whereby the matter is stated to have been settled between the parties.

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

5.

The bail application stands disposed of.

Pending application also stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J MAY 01, 2017 / tr BAIL APPLN. 2428/2016