M.K. Saini v. Indraprastha Power Gen. Co. Ltd. & ORS

$~25 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11384/2016 and C.M. Appl. No. 44644/2016 (for exemption) M.K. SAINI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Chandra Prakash, Advocate.

versus INDRAPRASTHA POWER GEN. CO. LTD. & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. R.K. Vats and Ms. Kumari Alka, Advocates for R-1 and 2.

Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Advocate for R3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 02.12.2016 1.

It is agreed and this writ petition is disposed of with a consent order that this writ petition will be treated as a representation to the employer/respondent nos. 1 and 2 and respondent nos. 1 and 2 will decide the representation and the entitlement, if any, of the petitioner to grant of promotion.

The representation will be considered by respondent nos. 1 and 2 in accordance with law expeditiously and such representation be decided within a period of three months from today.

2.

The present writ petition is accordingly disposed of. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J DECEMBER 02, 2016/AK