Vijay v. State

$~5.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3567/2016 VIJAY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ankur Sood and Ms. Romila Mandal, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Manoj, PS Kanjhawala

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 10.02.2017 The petitioner had preferred this writ petition to seek parole in November 2016. However, the latest nominal roll on record shows that the petitioner was released on furlough for a period of two weeks between 28.12.2016 and 11.01.2017. Thus, the ground for seeking parole does not survive as of now.

The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner may seek parole as and when justified.

VIPIN SANGHI, J FEBRUARY 10, 2017 sr