High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/1311/2015

Naveen Dabas v. State

2015-08-14Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar3 pages

$~17 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1311/2015 NAVEEN DABAS ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for Ms.Kamna vohra, APP.

SI Naresh Kumar, P.S.Begumpur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

O R D E R

% 14.08.2015 The petitioner seeks his release on parole for the twin purposes of filing SLP before the Supreme Court of India as also for attending to the illness of his father. Additionally the petitioner wishes to re-establish his social ties with the family members and the society. The aforesaid prayer of the petitioner was rejected by the competent authority on 13.5.2015. Hence this petition.

The status report which is on record affirms the residence of the petitioner and further reveals that the father of the petitioner is suffering from heart disease and is being treated at Jaipur Golden hospital, Rohini. However, he is not hospitalised at the moment. The nominal roll of the petitioner further confirms the fact that his overall conduct in the jail has been satisfactory. The petitioner has remained

in custody for about four years by now.

Nominal roll further discloses the fact that on several occasions the petitioner was released on interim bail and no complaint from any quarter was received against him.

A person/convict is required to avail his remedies under the law. It is a matter of public policy to allow the convicts to reconnect social ties. Considering the above facts, the petitioner is directed to be released on parole for a period of 30 days from the date of his release subject to the petitioner furnishing a bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, subject to the following conditions:- e) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities on or before the expiry of the said period of parole. f) The petitioner shall not engage himself in any unlawful activity. g) If the petitioner is required to go out of the territory of Delhi, he would intimate about his visit to the SHO of the concerned police station.

h) He shall furnish his mobile telephone number and the mobile telephone number of both the sureties to the SHO of the concerned police station so that in case of necessity he could be tracked and his whereabouts could be ascertained.

In case, the petitioner flouts any one of the conditions, an application could be moved by the SHO for cancellation of his parole and for taking of the coercive steps for securing his attendance. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. A copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of the

concerned Jail for information and compliance. Dasti.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J AUGUST 14, 2015 k