High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2766/2017

Ravi Kumar & ORS v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS

2017-11-29Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak3 pages

/ "1 Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-19/76 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2732/2017 SUNIL KUMAR TIWARI & ORS . Petitioners Through Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi and Mr.

Sandeep, Advs.

versus d THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Respondents Through Ms. M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Praveen Kumar, P.S. Mandawali for the State Mr. Pramil Kumar, Adv. with private respondents AND + CRL.M.C. 2766/2017 RAVI KUIVIAR & ORS Petitioners Through Mr. Pramil Kumar, Adv.

versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through Ms. G.M. Farooqui, APP with SI Praveen Kumar, P.S. Mandawali for the State Mr. Dalip Kumar Santoshi and Mr.

Sandeep, Advs. for the private respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 29.11.2017 It is submitted that petitioners and private respondents, in both the

matters, are neighbours. Petitioners and private respondents are also involved in the cross FIRs, quashing whereof has been prayed by these petitions. Petitioners and private respondents have prayed for quashing of the following cross FIRs:- FIR No.

293/2013 under Sections 147/148/149/325/427/452/392/397/354/506/509/34 IPC registered at P.S. Mandawali on the complaint of Mr. Ashok Kumar (respondent no. 2) in Cr1. M.C. No. 2732/20 17; and FIR No. 249/2013 under Sections 147/148/149/307/308/323/324/325 IPC & Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 registered at P.S. Mandawali on the complaint of Mr. Sandeep Kumar (respondent no. 2) in Cr1. M.C. No. 2766/20 17 and petitioner no. 3 in Cr1. M.C. No. 2732/2017. It is submitted that with the interventions of their common friends and family members, petitioners and private respondents have settled their disputes; therefore, aforesaid cross FIRs may be quashed. Petitioners and private respondents, in both the petitions, are present in Court along with their counsels and have been identified by SI Praveen Kumar of police station Mandawali. Private respondents submit that they are not willing to

pursue the FIRs any further against the petitioners and the same may be quashed.

Keeping in view the fact that a quarrel took place between the petitioners and private respondents on some trivial matter, which had led to the incident, resulted in registration of the cross FIRs and they have settled their disputes amicably with the intervention of their common friends and family members in order to maintain harmonious relations in future, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice both the FIRs, that is, FIR No. 293/2013 under Sections 147/148/149/325/427/452/39/397/354/506/509/34 IPC and FIR No.

249/2013 under Sections 147/148/149/307/308/323/324/325 IPC & Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 registered at P.S. Mandawali and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. P THAK, J.

NOVEMBER 299 2017 r. bararia