Mayank Dahiya @ Mayank v. The State NCT Of Delhi

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1292/2017 MAYANK DAHIYA @ MAYANK ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sanjay Rathi, Advocate with petitioner in person.

versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 11.10.2017 1.

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.145/2017 under Sections 376/343/451/365/34 IPC, PS Bawana, Delhi. 2.

Status report has been filed by the State.

3.

It is informed by learned APP for the State that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required. 4.

Considering that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required as submitted by learned APP for the State, it is directed that in the event of arrest, petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ₹1 lac with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO concerned subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall not leave the country without the permission of the Court.

BAIL APPLN. 1292/2017

(ii) The petitioner shall not try to contact the complainant through any mode or influence the witnesses.

5.

The petitioner is directed to join investigation if required by the IO/SHO concerned.

6.

Application is allowed.

7.

As prayed, copy of the order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

OCTOBER 11, 2017 'st'

BAIL APPLN. 1292/2017