Swarn Singh Dhingra v. Bimla Arora

$~ 28 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RC.REV. 327/2015 & CM No. 12069/2015 SWARN SINGH DHINGRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ravi Verma for Mr. Ajay Paul, Adv.

versus BIMLA ARORA ..... Respondent Through:

Dr. Sandeep Arora, son of the respondent in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 18.01.2018 There is another request for adjournment on behalf of the petitioner. It is pointed out by the respondent who is present through her son Dr. Sandeep Arora that it was submitted by the petitioner on 26.04.2017 that the premises has already been vacated and peaceful possession handed over by him to the respondent, the only issue persisting being with regard to the claim of the petitioner for refund of the security deposit after adjustment of the dues payable to the respondent.

The matter has been adjourned thereafter earlier also.

No good ground to keep the petition alive and pending.

The premises have already been vacated.

The main revision petition is rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. The petitioner has the liberty to pursue his remedies in law with regard to the claim for refund of security deposit.

All pending applications stand disposed of in above terms. R.K.GAUBA, J JANUARY 18, 2018/nk