Chameli Devi v. Delhi Development Authority

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5788/2017 and CM No. 24116/2017 (exemption) CHAMELI DEVI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Joydeep Sharma, Adv.

versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 24.07.2017 Earlier petition filed by the petitioner seeking allotment of an LIG flat was disposed off with the observations and the directions as follows :

"2.

During the pendency of present writ petition, the case of the petitioner was considered by the Committee headed by the Chief Legal Advisor, DDA.

As per the Minutes of the Meeting dated 12.02.2010, the Committee was of the unanimous opinion that the case of the petitioner is covered by the wrong address policy, as the demand/allotment letter was not despatched at the address communicated by the petitioner in the year 1995-96.

The Committee was also of the unanimous opinion that the case of the petitioner shall be considered in the next draw of lots to be held for Housing Scheme of East Delhi, if available or any other locality and the costing shall be done as per the policy of the DDA.

3.

Accordingly, counsel for petitioner does not wish to press this petition.

DDA shall remain bound by the Minutes of the Meeting.

Petitioner undertakes to file an undertaking

that he had not sold the registration, nor he has accepted any earnest money for the same.

Petitioner also undertakes that the payment shall be made through cheque or demand and in any case of any loan, petitioner shall furnish the details to the DDA."

Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that though the representations have been made in pursuance of the afore-said orders, no allotment has come to be made, as yet. Mr. Sabharwal, ld. Standing Counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner has not approached the respondent since March, 2013 and that instant petition can be treated to be a representation, which can be decided in a time bound manner.

Keeping in view the totality of the facts and circumstances, it is directed that the instant petition shall be treated to be a representation of the petitioner for allotment, to be disposed off within a period of six weeks by a speaking order to be conveyed to the petitioner within a week thereafter.

Petition stands disposed off accordingly.

A. K. CHAWLA, J JULY 24, 2017 rc