Chote Lal & ORS v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR

$~19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2664/2017 CHOTE LAL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Vikram Yadav, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP for State with SI Shri Gopal, P.S.Shakar pur Mr. Karanjeet Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 29.08.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner and the complainant are the neighbourers. Due to the misunderstanding arisen between the parties, the father of the complainant no.2 late Umesh Kumar Jha filed a complaint qua the present petitioners before the learned MM and the learned MM took a cognizance on 08.04.2008 under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 182 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that on 08.04.2008 after taking cognizance, due to the intervention of the friends the matter is amicably settled and nothing remains to be adjudicated further and prays that summoning order and complaint under Section 200 Cr.PC be quashed.

Counsel further submits that after the registration of the FIR,

the near relatives and the friends intervened and the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated further between them and to have better relationship in near future, the present FIR, which is coming as a hurdle in their way, may be quashed.

The respondent no.2 is present in Court who has been identified by IO Sh. Gopal Singh. The respondent No.2 admits that he has settled the matter amicably with the petitioners. He further submits that the settlement/compromise has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion. He submits that nothing remains to be adjudicated further between them and he has no objection if the FIR in question is quashed.

Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated further between them. Consequently, the summoning order dated 08.04.2008 and the Complaint Case 153/2007 is set aside and the complaint under Section 200 Cr.PC qua the petitioners stands withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The present petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed. I.S.MEHTA, J AUGUST 29, 2017 mw