Md. Arif v. State

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3558/2016 MD. ARIF ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. S.K. Sethi and Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Ashish Negi and Ms. Seema Patnaha, Advs. for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State along with SI Sudhir Rathi, P.S. Subhash Place.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 10.04.2017 Petitioner seeks parole on the ground of maintaining social ties and also to be present with his old and aged parents for some time. Address of the petitioner has been verified. Petitioner was earlier released on parole last year. It is not the case that he has misused the concession of parole granted to him.

Keeping in mind the totality of circumstances, it is ordered that petitioner be released on parole for a period of one month from the date of his release, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Jail Superintendent. During the parole period, petitioner shall report to the SHO P.S. Saraswati Vihar once a week, that is, on Mondays at

10:00 am. On completion of parole period, petitioner shall surrender before the Superintendent Jail.

Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for serving it upon the petitioner and for compliance.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

APRIL 10, 2017 ga