Tirupati Balaji Fibrues Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-28, New Delhi

ix $-39 to 43 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11615/2016, CM APPL. 45814-15/2016 TIRUPATI BALAJI FIBRES LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.

And Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advs.

Versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL .CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI Respondent Through:

Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. St. Counsel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. St. Counsel.

+ W.P.(C) 11616/2016, CM APPL. 45816-17/2016 TIRUPATI BALAJI FIBRES LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash , Kr. And Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advs.

Versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL j CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI Respondent Through:

Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. St. Counsel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. St. Counsel.

+ W.P.(C) 11617/2016, CM APPL. 45818-19/2016 TIRUPATI BALAJI FIBRES LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.

And Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advs.

Versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI Respondent Through:

Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. St. Counsel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr.-St. Counsel.

+ W.P.(C) 11618/2016, CM APPL. 45820-21/2016 TIRUPATI BALAJI FIBRES LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.

And Mr. Ankit Giipta, Advs.

Versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF E4C0ME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. St. Counsel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. St. Counsel.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

+ W.P.(C) 11619/2016, CM APPL. 45822-23/2016 TIRUPATI BALAJIFIBRUES LIMITED Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.

And Ml'. Ankit Gupta, Advs.

Versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-28, NEW DELHI Respondent Through:

Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. St. Counsel and Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. St. Counsel.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

ORDER

% 18.01.2017 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the writ petitions.

The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. S. RAVIND^ BHAT, J JANUARY 18, 2017/acm NAJMI WAZIRI, J