Ajay Kumar Sonar v. State (Gnct Of Delhi)

$~67.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3510/2016 AJAY KUMAR SONAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Tarun Khanna and Hemant Singh, Advocates versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with Mr.

Siddarth Sindhu, Adv. with SI Shyam Sundar, PS Dwraka South

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 09.12.2016 The status report tendered in court is taken on record. The petitioner has preferred this petition to seek parole for a period of three months on the ground that he has to get married to the prosecutrix. In this regard, the petitioner has also placed on record the invitation card printed in relation to the said marriage.

The status report discloses a shocking state of affairs. The statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded and the original thereof is placed on record. In her statement, the prosecutrix has stated that there is no question of her marriage with the petitioner on 12.12.2016 or on any other date. She states that the card got printed by the petitioner is a fake card printed only

with a view to create a ground for parole. She submits that the petitioner's advocate had approached her and taken her signatures on a plain paper. In view of the aforesaid status report, there is no question of granting parole to the petitioner. Dismissed.

VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 09, 2016 sr