← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/3543/2016

Rahul & ORS v. State & ANR

2016-12-15Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~47 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3543/2016 RAHUL & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Mahesh Kumar Gautam, Adv.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for State ASI Satyavir Singh, PS-Khyala

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 15.12.2016 CRL.M.A. 19363/2016 Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 3543/2016 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 333/2016, under Sections 323/341/354B/34 IPC, registered at Police Station-Khyala, New Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners and the complainant are relatives and are living in nearby locality and due to misunderstanding between the parties, the complainant lodged FIR No. 333/2016, under Sections 323/341/354B/34 IPC at Police Station-Khyala, New Delhi. He has further submitted that after registration of the FIR qua the petitioners, the relatives and the friends intervened and the matter has been settled between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that all disputes have been amicably settled between the parties and

nothing remains to be adjudicated upon further and submits that the FIR in question is coming as hurdle in the way of the present petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners and the respondent No.2 want to lead peaceful life in near future and since all disputes have been settled between them, the FIR in question and all proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed. The respondent No.2/complainant is present in Court today and has been identified by the Investigating Officer, ASI Satyavir Singh, P.S.Khyala, Delhi. The respondent No.2/complainant also admits that the petitioners are her relatives and the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners and has no claim or grievance left against the petitioners. She also admits that she has filed an affidavit dated 6th December, 2016. She further submits that the settlement/compromise has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion. She further submits that he has no objection if the FIR in question is quashed.

Looking into the above facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated further and in order to maintain good relations and harmony amongst the parties, who are stated to be relatives, I deem it appropriate to quash the FIR No. 333/2016, under Sections 323/341/354B/34 IPC, registered at Police Station-Khyala, New Delhi, and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

The present petition is disposed of accordingly. Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed. I.S.MEHTA, J DECEMBER 15, 2016/radhika