← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./2695/2017

Mohd Arif v. The State & ANR

2017-07-18Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak3 pages

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2692/2017 & Cr!. M.A. no. 11172/2017 MOHD ILLIYAS & ORS.

Petitioners Through : Mr. S.M. Jamal, Adv.

versus THE STATE & ANR.

Respondents Through :Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Amit Kumar and SI Prakash Chand, P.S. Kotwali for respondent no. 1 Mohammad Sajid, Adv. for respondent no. 2 + CRL.M.C. 2695/2017 & Cr1. M.A. no. 11177/2017 MOHD ARIF Petitioner Through Mohammad Sajid, Adv.

versus THE STATE & ANR.

Through Respondents Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Amit Kumar and SI Prakash Chand, P.S. Kotwali for respondent no. 1 Mr. S.M. Jamal, Adv. for respondent no. 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK By:AMULYA

I

ORDER

% 18.07.2017 By these petitions, petitioners (accused persons) have prayed for quashing of following two cross FIRs:- FIR No. 182/2012 under Sections 326/34 IPC registered at P.S. Kotwali on the complaint of Mohd. Arif (respondent no. 2) in Cr1. M.C. No. 2692/20 17.

FIR No. 181/2012 under Sections 324 IPC registered at P.S. Kotwali on the complaint of Mohd. Illiyas (respondent no. 2) in Cr!. M.C. No. 2695/2017.

Mohd. Arif and Mohd. Illiyas (complainant/respondent no. 2 in both the above petitions) are present in Court and submit that they have settled the disputes amicably with the accused persons (petitioners in both the above petitions) and are not willing to pursue both the above-mentioned FIRs any further. They admit having settled the matter with the petitioners of their own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Keeping in mind the fact that accused persons and complainants were known to each other, a quarrel took place between them on some trivial matter and now they have settled their disputes amicably in order to maintain harmonious relations in future, in the interest of justice, both the

above-mentioned FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous. Dasti. A.K. J.

JULY 189 2017 rb