Nagpal Traders v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes & ANR.

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6055/2017 NAGPAL TRADERS ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Adv.

versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Satyakam, ASC.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

O R D E R

% 19.07.2017 CM No. 25173/2017 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) No.6055/2017

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the 'C' Form will be furnished to the VATO concerned within one week.

3. It is, accordingly, directed that within one week thereafter, the refund order be issued by the Revenue and within a week thereafter, the refund amount together with interest accrued thereon be paid directly to the account of the Petitioner.

4. As regards the interest for the period during which the 'C' Form is not available, the payment of the amount will be subject to the final outcome of

the appeals preferred by the Revenue before the Supreme Court against the order dated 19th January, 2017 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 10701 of 2016 etc. (Vizien Organics v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes).

5. In the event the Petitioner has any grievance regarding non-compliance with the above directions, it would be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

6. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. S.MURALIDHAR, J PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J JULY 19, 2017 dk