Lata v. State & ORS

$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2814/2017 LATA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. R.K. Bharani, Advocate with petitioner in person.

versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State.

Mr. Himanshu Verma, Advocate for R-2 to R-4 with respondent Nos.2 to 4 are in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 24.07.2017 The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No.121/2011 registered under Sections 323/341/356/506 r/w section 34 IPC at P.S. Bharat Nagar, Delhi, on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that a compromise/settlement has been arrived at between the parties in the matter. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are present in Court today and are identified by the learned counsel. They state that they have settled the matter with the petitioner with their own free will and choice without any threat, pressure and coercion and do not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Statements of the parties have been recorded separately. CRL.M.C. 2814/2017

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences voluntarily and out of their own free will and without any coercion, pressure, and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings. It would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No.121/2011 registered under Sections 323/341/356/506 r/w section 34 IPC at P.S. Bharat Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

The petition is disposed of.

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J JULY 24, 2017 afa CRL.M.C. 2814/2017