Majid Sheikh Mansoori v. State

$~113.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 43/2017 MAJID SHEIKH MANSOORI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vikas Padora, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Avi Singh, ASC along with SI Parmod Kumar, PS-Sangam Vihar, for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 06.01.2017 The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek parole to be able to find a suitable match for his unmarried daughter. The order of rejection dated 09.09.2016 shows that at that point of time, the petitioner had not availed of two weeks furlough granted by the DG(P) vide order dated 16.06.2016. Subsequently, the petitioner has availed of the furlough. In these circumstances, it is open to the petitioner to apply for parole once again to the concerned authorities. Let the petitioner do so. In case the petitioner moves an application seeking parole, the same shall be decided expeditiously.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 06, 2017 B.S. Rohella