Anju Bansal v. Raj Gupta

$~5 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 691/2017 ANJU BANSAL ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Ajay Kohli and Ms. Pooja Vohra, Advocates (Mobile No. 9999160686).

versus RAJ GUPTA ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 13.12.2018 1.

Since the respondent has not responded to the perjury notice issued to her under Section 340 Cr.P.C., and no reply is filed by the respondent, accordingly, the Registrar General of this Court is directed to file a complaint in the competent court of the Metropolitan Magistrate as against the respondent for the perjury committed by the respondent in filing false C.M. Appl. No. 36013/2018.

2.

No further orders are accordingly required to be passed in this appeal. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J DECEMBER 13, 2018 AK