Gopal Chand v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & ANR.

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6346/2017 GOPAL CHAND ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Advocate versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR..... Respondents Through Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1.

Mr. Ikrant Sharma and Ms. Divya Upadhyay, Advocates for respondent no.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 26.07.2017 CM.APPL Nos.26283-26284/2017(exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of.

CM.APPL No.26285/2017(stay) The application is dismissed as not pressed at this stage. W.P.(C) 6346/2017 Petitioner claims that he suffering from 85% disability and has been squatting in the Lajpat Nagar area since 2007. He submits that in the month of May, 2017, he has been removed by the respondents. While learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that this Court in the case of VYAPARI KALYAN MANDAL MAIN PUSHPA & ANR v. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS, reported at 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8962 held that Pushp Vihar area has been declared as a 'no-squatting', 'no-vending zone', he

submits that he would make an application to the concerned authorities seeking an alternative site. It is also prayed that the application should be considered favourably and expeditiously keeping in view his 85% disability. Heard. The petition is dismissed as not pressed. In case the petitioner approaches the respondent, the request of the petitioner would be considered expeditiously and in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of.

Dasti.

G.S.SISTANI, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J JULY 26, 2017 pst W.P.(C) 6346/2017 2/2