High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/34/2017

Sushil Vashisht v. State (NCT) Of Delhi & ANR.

2017-01-06Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi1 pages

$~106.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 34/2017 SUSHIL VASHISHT ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. L.M. Grover, Advocate.

versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 06.01.2017 Crl.M.A. No.168/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 34/2017 and Crl.M.A. No. 169/2017 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He states that he shall urge all the arguments in defence before the Trial Court.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks four weeks time to deposit the costs imposed by the learned ASJ. Let the said costs be deposited within four weeks.

VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 06, 2017 B.S. Rohella