Saravjeet Singh v. State
$~40 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 1426/2015 SARAVJEET SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:
Mr.Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate.
versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:
Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC.
Insp.Ravinder Ahlawat, P.S.Karol Bagh.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
% 15.07.2015 The petitioner questions the order dated 1.6.2015 passed by the competent authority whereby his prayer for being released on parole in order to attend the death anniversary of his mother was rejected on the ground that such anniversary has already been held. The additional ground raised by the petitioner was to look after his brother whose leg was fractured in a road accident.
Status report has been filed by Ms.Richa Kapoor during the course of hearing.
Same grounds have been taken in the status report on which the competent authority passed its decision.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out at the nominal roll to indicate that the petitioner has
remained in jail for two years out of a total term of 10 years. It has also been pointed out that on the last occasion the petitioner was released on parole from 26.7.2014 to 24.8.214, on the expiry of which he surrendered before the jail authorities. The conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory in jail. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in order to reconnect his social ties, he is required to come out of jail for a limited period.
Considering the abovenoted facts, this court is inclined to release the petitioner on parole for a period of 15 days from the date of his release.
Let the petitioner be released on parole for a period of 15 days from the date of his release subject to the petitioner furnishing a bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, one such surety shall be the brother of the petitioner to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, subject to the following conditions:- a) The petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities on or before the expiry of the said period of parole. b) The petitioner shall not engage himself in any unlawful activity.
c) The petitioner would not leave, under any circumstance, the National Capital Territory of Delhi.
d) He shall furnish his mobile telephone number and the mobile telephone number of both the sureties to the SHO of the concerned police station so that in case of necessity he could be tracked and his whereabouts could be ascertained. In case, the petitioner flouts any one of the conditions, an
application could be moved by the SHO for cancellation of his parole and for taking coercive steps for securing his attendance. With these observations, the petition is disposed of. Dasti.
A copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of the concerned Jail for information and compliance. ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J JULY 15, 2015 k