← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/3582/2016

Rajat @ Rajat Chaudhary v. Govt.Of N.C.T. Of Delhi & ANR.

2016-12-23Hon'Ble Mr. Justice P.S.Teji3 pages

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RAJAT @ RAJAT CHAUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ajay Garg & Mr.Ashwini Kumar Sood, Advs. with petitioner in person.

versus GOVT.OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondent Through Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for State with SI Umed Pal, PS Mukherjee Nagar.

Respondent no.2 and 3 in person with Ms.Neha Garg, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 23.12.2016 Statements of respondent no.2 (Srishti Chamola) and respondent no.3 (Udaya Barua) recorded separately. Vide separate order, the present petition has been disposed of.

STATEMENT OF MS.SRISHTI CHAMOLA DAUGHTER OF SHRI RAHUL CHAMOLA, RESIDENT OF G-55, SECTOR-39, NOIDA, U.P.

ON S.A.

I am respondent no.2 in the present case.

I have entered into a compromise with the petitioner and I have no objection if the FIR registered against the petitioner is quashed. I pray that the FIR No.807/2016 registered under Sections 323/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, New Delhi, may be quashed.

RO & AC

STATEMENT OF MR.UDAYA BARUA, SON OF SHRI RAJA BARUA, RESIDENT OF A-88, NEAR NOIDA PUBLIC SCHOOL, SECTOR-23, GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR, NOIDA-201301, U.P.

ON S.A.

I am respondent no.3 in the present case.

I have entered into a compromise with the petitioner and I have no objection if the FIR registered against the petitioner is quashed. I pray that the FIR No.807/2016 registered under Sections 323/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, New Delhi, may be quashed.

RO & AC