Anil v. Dev Karan Gupta

$~23 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RSA 348/2015 and C.M.

Nos.20592/2015 (stay), 20594/2015 (condonation of delay in re-filing) & 20595/2015 (condonation of delay in filing) ANIL ..... Appellant Through:

None.

versus DEV KARAN GUPTA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Rohit Arora, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 29.07.2016 1.

No one appeared for the appellant on 18.1.2016 and 8.4.2016. On 8.4.2016, the matter was listed for 27.5.2016. On 27.5.2016, since the Hon'ble Judge was on leave, no Court was held, however, the order of that date shows appearance on behalf of the respondent but not on behalf of the appellant.

In this Regular Second Appeal, notice was issued subject to the appellant depositing the entire decretal amount and which is also said to be not deposited.

2.

Since no one appears for the appellant today and no one appeared for the appellant even earlier on 18.1.2016, 8.4.2016 and 27.5.2016, this appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. Let RSA No.348/2015

no application for restoration/recall of this order be entertained unless costs of Rs.10,000/- are first paid to the counsel for the respondent. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J JULY 29, 2016 Ne RSA No.348/2015