R Harshinder v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

$~38 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2142/2017 R HARSHINDER ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Neha Kapoor, Adv.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Adv. for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 31.07.2017 1.

The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C for extension of parole.

2.

Verification report has been filed.

3.

Nominal roll has been received.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on an application of the petitioner for his release on parole submitted to the Government of NCT of Delhi, the petitioner was ordered to be released by an order dated 3rd May, 2017. Pursuant to this order, the petitioner was released on 3rd July, 2017. She submits that the petitioner has been advised swimming as well as physiotherapy to recover from his injuries.

She submits that the petitioner has been facing difficulty in moving as no proper treatment was given to him at DDU hospital.

The petitioner has applied for extension of parole which has not been responded to.

5.

The petitioner has placed on record the photostat copies of the treatment/prescriptions.

Lastly, the petitioner was under the treatment of Dr.Pankaj Anand, Tirath Ram Shah Charitable Hospital, Rajpur road, Delhi. 6.

As per the verification, Dr.Pankaj Anand informed that the patient needs physiotherapy but swimming is not mandatory. It is pointed out that the facility of physiotherapy is available in Room No.2, OPD, in DDU Hospital.

7.

In these circumstances, the petitioner may avail of the physiotherapy facility at DDU Hospital as suggested and prescribed by the Medical Officer Dr.Pankaj Anand. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for extension of parole.

8.

The petition is dismissed.

VINOD GOEL, J.

JULY 31, 2017/jitender