← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./1358/2015

Ratan Singh v. State Through NCT Of Delhi

2015-07-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

$~44 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1358/2015 RATAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Vivek Vidyarthi, Adv.

versus STATE THROUGH NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP.

Insp. Pardeep Kumar & SI K.P. ` Singh, PS Hazrat Nizamuddin,

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

O R D E R

% 13.07.2015 Crl.M.A.9818/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of, accordingly.

Bail Appn. 1358/2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and APP for the state. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased Constable who is stated to have committed suicide.

After investigation, charge sheet was submitted and cognizance has been taken.

The petitioner was given interim bail by order dated 04.07.2015 by the court below so as to appear before the Trial court on the next date of hearing.

The petitioner could not appear before the Trial court on 08.07.2015 on the ground that he was bedridden because of the aggravated form of Tuberculosis, the disease which he had been suffering from for a

long time.

Considering the fact that order of the court was not obeyed as the petitioner did not appear before the court which had summoned him, extension of the interim bail was refused.

Hence this application.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is a government servant and is suffering from Tuberculosis, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the condition that he would appear before the court on the next date fixed.

In the event of arrest or surrender before the court below where the case is pending trial, the petitioner is directed to be released on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, one such surety to be a local person, subject to the satisfaction of either arresting officer or the Trial court, as the case may be. Needless to say that the petitioner would join the proceedings of the Court and would not cause any delay in early disposal of the case. In case, Trial court considers that the petitioner is delaying the whole process of trial, it would be at liberty to cancel the bail and take the petitioner in custody. Application is disposed of accordingly.

Dasti.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J JULY 13, 2015 ab