Meenu Begum And ORS v. Dda And ORS

#5 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11759/2016 & CM APPL. 46345/2016 MEENU BEGUM AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through None versus DDA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA.

Ms. Niharika, Proxy Counsel for Mr.

Anupam Srivastava, ASC for R-4&5.

Ms. Nitin Jain, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Standing Counsel for DUSIB.

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 07.02.2017 Despite a pass over, none is present for the petitioners. In fact, the writ petition has not been amended even though learned counsel for the petitioner had made a statement to the said effect. Consequently, present writ petition and application are dismissed in default and on account of non-prosecution.

MANMOHAN, J FEBRUARY 07, 2017 rn