Sarvjeet Kaur v. Manish Gupta Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation

$-45,46 I *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ '

CONT.CAS(C) 617/2015 .

SARVJEET KAUR Petitioner Through Mr. M.M. Popli, Advocate versus MANISH GUPTA COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL ..... Respondent Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Standing Counsel with Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for SDMC.

Mr. Devesh Singh,ASC for GNCTD.

CORPORATION Through CONT.CAS(C) 758/2015 MOHAN SWARUP + Petitioner Through Mr. M.M. Popli, Advocate versus PUNEET K GOYAL AND ANR Respondents Through Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Standing Counsel with Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for SDMC.

Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC with .

Mr. Manzar Anis, Advocate for respondent no.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL %

ORDER

17.02.2017 Counsels for the respondents submit that the present petitions are not maintainable for the reason that the order dated 04.02.2015 cannot be complied with on account of the fact that the scheme has been stayed by another Division Bench of this Court. Additionally, it is pointed out that the file pertaining to By:AMULYA

Notification of the, Rules was returned by the Lt. Governor of Delhi raising certain clarifications and the Department of Urban Affairs, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and the Law Department are seized of the matter. At this stage, Mr. Popli, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petitions may be disposed of at this stage with liberty to file a fresh petition in case the stay is vacated.

The writ petitions are disposed of with liberty, as prayed. CMs.APPL 10743-10744/2016 in C6NT.CAS(0 617/2015 CM.APPL 9682/2016 in CONT-CASfQ 758/2015 The applications also stand disposed of in view of above. G.S.SISTANI, jT VINODGOEL,J FEBRUARY 17, 2017 pst .

, '

CONT.CAS(C) 617/2015 etc.

2/2