High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/474/2017

Vivek Chaudhary & ANR. v. The State Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2017-02-14Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

$~50 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 474/2017 VIVEK CHAUDHARY & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through :Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal & Ms.

Neelam Agarwal, Advs.

versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through :Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. & SI Brijender Kumar, P.S. North Rohini for the State Mr. Jaideep Malik and Mr. Sanjeev Garg, Advs. for respondent no. 2 with respondent no. 2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 14.02.2017 Crl. M.A. No. 2629/2017 (condonation of delay) Delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.A.2628/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 474/2017 It is submitted that petitioners and respondent no. 2 have settled their

disputes amicably before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre on 14th December, 2016 vide Settlement Agreement (Annexure P-3). It is prayed that FIR No. 224/2016 under Sections 380/385/506(ii)/120-B IPC registered at Police Station North Rohini be quashed. Respondent no. 2 is present in Court along with his counsel and submits that he has settled the matter with the petitioners of his own free will and without any undue force, coercion and pressure. He further submits that terms of the settlement have already been complied with and he has already received the entire settled amount.

He further submits that he is not willing to pursue the FIR any further.

In view of the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 before the Mediation Centre voluntarily, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 224/2016 under Sections 380/385/506(ii)/120-B IPC registered at Police Station North Rohini and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

FEBRUARY 14, 2017/rb