Mohd Naeem Ansari v. The South Delhi Municipal Corporation And ORS

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6749/2017 MOHD NAEEM ANSARI ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Tanya Tyagi and Mr. Taranjeet Singh, Advs.

versus THE SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel for SDMC with Mr. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advs. for SDMC Dr. Mait George and Mr. Swaroop George, Advs. for R-2 Mr. Rajeev Saxena, Mr. M.D. Sohail, Mr. Manish Khurana and Ms.

Namrata Chauhan, Advs. for R-3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R D E R

% 18.01.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner states, in view of para 4 of the ATR (reproduced as under) filed by the Assistant Commissioner Central Zone SDMC, the grievance of the petitioner does not survive and he wishes to withdraw the petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn: "4.

That vide removal action dated 28.12.2017 upon availability of police force, the alleged porta cabin was removed and immediately upon removing the same, letter has also been sent to the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South East Distt. requesting thereby to ensure that re-encroachment will not occur. Photographs of the removal action and copy of the letter sent in this regard are annexed here with as Annexure „A‟coly."

CM No. 28081/2017 (by the petitioner) & CM No. 42843/2017 (by respondent No.3) Dismissed as infructuous.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J JANUARY 18, 2018/aky