Sant Ram v. State

$~22 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2262/2017 SANT RAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC with Ms.Priyanka Sharma, Advocate for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC for State along with SI Pravesh Kumar, PS Geeta Colony, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 12.10.2017 1.

Status report has been handed over in the court by learned ASC. Same is taken on record. Copy supplied. Nominal roll has already been received.

2.

The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.PC') seeking his release on parole for three months in order to re-establish social ties with family members and society.

3.

As per the status report, the address of the petitioner, where he would reside in case he is released on parole, is found to be correct. His family consists of his wife, one son aged 19 years and one daughter aged 20 years. They have been residing together at the given address.

4.

Vide order dated 30.05.2017, the request of the petitioner for his release on parole was rejected by the competent authority since the requisite period of six months had not elapsed from the date of termination of previous parole.

5.

As per the nominal roll, the petitioner was convicted for the offence u/s 302 IPC, arising out of FIR No. 127/1997, PS Geeta Colony, Delhi by the learned ASJ, Delhi and he was awarded life imprisonment. His criminal appeal, being Crl.A. 632/2000 was dismissed by this court on 22.02.2016.

He remained on parole for a period of four weeks from 29.10.2016 to 26.11.2016 pursuant to the orders of this Court. His overall conduct in the jail is found to be satisfactory. 6.

In these circumstances, the petitioner be released on parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on the following terms and conditions: - (i) he shall furnish his personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent.

(ii) the petitioner shall maintain good conduct and behaviour during his release on parole.

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the National Capital of Delhi without the permission of the Court.

(iv) he shall provide mobile number of his surety to the SHO of the concerned Police Station, which shall be kept in active mode and shall not be changed without permission of this court. (v) he shall report his presence to the SHO of the area every Monday and Thursday at 11:00 AM.

(vi) he shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent soon after completion of his parole.

7.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

8.

Copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for compliance. 9.

Copy of this order be given dasti.

VINOD GOEL, J.

OCTOBER 12, 2017 "shailendra"