Manjula Pandith M v. Orient Bell Pvt Ltd

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3210/2017 & CRL.M.A. 13236/2017 MANJULA PANDITH M .....Petitioner Through:

Nemo

Versus

ORIENT BELL PVT LTD .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Anshuj Dhingra and Ms. Harpreet Nagi, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 10.07.2019 Quashing of proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 are sought in this petition. None appears on behalf of petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent submits that petitioner has been declared as proclaimed offender by the trial court. Since none appears on behalf of petitioner, the petition and the application are dismissed in default.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE JULY 10, 2019 v