Ravi v. State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi)

$~21 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2630/2016 RAVI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Pawan Sharma, Advocate.

versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with SI Amit Kumar, P.S. Ranhola, Delhi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 21.12.2016 Crl.M.A.No.19856/2016 (Exemption) Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 2630/2016 This is an application under Section 439 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in case FIR No.0637/2016, under Sections 323/324/341/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Ranhola, Delhi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a law abiding citizen and he has been arrested in case FIR No.0637/2016, under Sections 323/324/341/506/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Ranhola, Delhi. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is in J/C since 4th November, 2016. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation in the instant case. Counsel has further submitted that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital. Counsel further submits that there is likelihood of filing the charge sheet and no purpose would be served if the petitioner is kept further in custody and prays that the petitioner may be released on bail.

Notice.

Learned APP for the State accepts notice and opposes the grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP for the State submits that the petitioner along with his other co-accused has caused injury on the person of the injured with a sharp edged weapon and the investigation is at the initial stage and two other accused persons are yet to be arrested in this case. Learned APP for the State, however, submits that the injured has already been released from the hospital.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the petitioner is in J/C since 4th November, 2016 and the injured has already been released from the hospital and the petitioner is not required for further investigation, I admit the petitioner on bail, on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned MM with the condition that the petitioner shall not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court concerned and he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not visit the house of the complainant till the disposal of the case. However, this order shall not affect the merits of the

case.

The bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Copy of this order be given dasti, as prayed. I.S.MEHTA, J DECEMBER 21, 2016 'dc'