Ghanshyam @ Javed v. State

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3384/2018 GHANSHYAM @ JAVED ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Nitish Chaudhary and Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for Mr.

Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 02.11.2018 Crl.M.A. No. 35632/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(CRL) 3384/2018 1.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks furlough for a period of three weeks and also challenges the communication dated 19th April, 2018 whereby his request for grant of 1st spell of furlough was rejected on the ground that his conduct in the jail is unsatisfactory. 2.

Notice.

3.

Learned proxy counsel for learned Standing Counsel for the State accepts notice.

W.P.(CRL) 3384/2018

4.

A perusal of the nominal roll of the petitioner reveals that he has been awarded two punishments in the year 2018 itself one for abusing the escorting staff during Court production and the other fighting and hitting with the fellow inmates. Since furlough is a reward of good conduct and the petitioner's conduct in this year itself is unsatisfactory, this Court finds no ground to interfere in the order dated 19th April, 2018 rejecting the application of the petitioner seeking 1st spell of furlough. 5.

Petition is dismissed.

6.

Copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

NOVEMBER 02, 2018 'yo'

W.P.(CRL) 3384/2018