Mir Ali v. State Of NCT Delhi & ORS

$~21&24 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 4821/2016 MIRALI Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Ashim Yachher, Adv.

versus Respondent Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with ASI Hari Singh PS Parliament Street.

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv. for R-2.

STATE OF NOT DELHI & ORS Represented by:

+ CRL.M.C. 4832/2016 MIRALI Represented by:

Petitioner Mr. Ashim Yachher, Adv.

versus Respondent Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with ASI Hari Singh PS Parliament Street.

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv. for R-2.

STATE OF NOT DELHI & ORS.

Represented by:

CORAM;

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

% 22.12.2016 Crl.M.A. 20030/2016 in CRL.M.C. 4821/2016 Crl.M.A. 20054/2016 in CRL.M.C. 4832/2016 Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. CRL.M.CS.

4821/2016 & 4832/2016 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

CRL.M.C. 4821/2016 & CrLM.A. 20029/2016 Tstav) CRL.M.C. 4832/2016 & CrlM.A. 20053/2016 Tstav) After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file an application seeking bail after surrendering before the learned Trial Court.

Petitions and applications are dismissed as withdrawn. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

DECEMBER 22,2016 'ga'

CRLM. Cs. 4821/2016 4832/2016