Piyush Sharma v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1524/2017 PIYUSH SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Surinder Singh and Mr. Kaushal Chauhan, Advs.

Versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP Dr. (Maj.) J.C. Vashista and Ms.

Yashika Sood, Advs.

for the complainant

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 09.08.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that complainant had hardly stayed with petitioner for about 11⁄2 years. Complainant could not adjust in the family of petitioner. Their relations became sour. Complainant has falsely implicated the petitioner and his family members and levelled serious allegations in the FIR. It is submitted that complainant has levelled allegations against the character of petitioner. She alleged that petitioner was having relations with his mother and he used to sleep in her room.

Counsel for the further submits that whatever articles of the complainant were with the petitioner have been returned before the Investigating Officer. Petitioner had taken 27 articles to the Police Station, out of which complainant has accepted only 19 articles.

She declined to accept the remaining articles.

Learned APP submits that serious allegations have been levelled by the complainant against the petitioner and her jewellery articles have not been returned. However, a list of articles, annexed with the status report, has not been disputed. It has not been disputed that petitioner had taken 27 articles to the police station, out of which 19 articles have been accepted by the complainant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that jewellery articles remained all along with the complainant. Petitioner has already returned the car. He further submits that petitioner has cooperated in the investigation. Even maintenance awarded by the trial Court is being paid by the petitioner.

Keeping in mind the totality of facts and circumstances of this case, it is ordered that in case of arrest, petitioner be released on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand

Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/SHO concerned. Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

AUGUST 09, 2018 r.bararia