Siya Ram v. State

$~47 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2269/2017 SIYA RAM ..... Petitioner Through Mr. S B Dahdapani, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajesh Mohan, ASC with SI Sunil Kumar, PS S P Badli

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 09.08.2017 Petitioner is seeking parole for the partition of the property. Petitioner has already availed the benefit of furlough for a period of two weeks in the months of January, 2017 and April, 2017, respectively. Remaining sentence of the petitioner is about 31⁄2 months.Keeping in mind that petitioner had been out on furlough on two occasions and had sufficient time to take care of the property matters, I am not inclined to grant parole.

Petition is dismissed.

A.K. PATHAK, J AUGUST 09, 2017 sm