Chander Prakash Kayat v. Sarita

$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 95/2015 & CM Nos.13264, 13266/2015 CHANDER PRAKASH KAYAT ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Azhar Qayum, Adv.

with appellant versus SARITA ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Pramish Singh and Mr. M.S. Saran Kumar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 15.03.2016 1.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 2.

The appellant has assailed the order dated 30th May, 2015 disposing of the respondent-wife's application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

The trial court has not accepted the wife's prayer for grant of ad-interim maintenance of `20,000/- for herself as well as for the minor son of the parties and the claim for litigation expenses of `50,000/-.

3.

On an assessment of the husband's income at `20,000/- per month, the Family Judge has awarded maintenance pendente lite @ `6,000/- per month for the wife and `2,000/- for the child. Litigation expenses of `11,000/- MAT.APP.(F.C.)No.95/2015

as a one time award have been granted. The wife has not assailed this order. The order is reasoned and fair as an interim measure. We see no reason to interfere with this order. The appeal and the applications are dismissed. GITA MITTAL, J I.S.MEHTA, J MARCH 15, 2016/kr MAT.APP.(F.C.)No.95/2015