← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./65/2017

Sunder Shyam Dua v. State & ANR

2018-07-10Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak2 pages

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

$-17,21 & 22 .

, .

• .

• ; , ^ , *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ , CRL.M.C.'55/2017 ^ . YQGESHKAMATH , • ..... Petitioner '

/ • , '

'

~ Through:Mr.iA^irudhSingh,Adv. / '

• , '

\ t L / '

"

• versus • , STATE & ANR , '

.....Respondents Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for the State.

• . Mr.RajatNavet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv. "

forR-2.

'

.

+ CRL.M.C. 65/2017 .

.

\ SUNDER SHYAM DUA, ..... Petitioner '

, Through:Mr.AnirudhSingh,Adv.

• , , - • versus , ;

^ .

STATE & ANR ;

, .....Respondents ' , ^ Through: Ms.ManjeetArya, APP for the State.

Mr.Rajat Navet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.

• '

^fbrR.2. '

^ ^ + CRL.M.C;66/2017 ^ NIKHILPAl^YA ;

• ....Petitioner , through:Mr.AnirudhSingh,Adv.

versus , ., '

, , :

STATE& ANR • ^ .....Respondent Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APPXor the State.

Mr.Rajat Navet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.

•:

;''.

•fbrR-2.

: ••

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

ORDER

% 10.07.2018 .

It is submitted that the matter has been compromised between the petitioner and the complainant, i.e. respondent Nd.2. Counsel for respondentNo.2saysthatthe complainthas alreadyb^nwithdrawn. Thispetitionhas becomeinfhictuousand disposed A.K. PATHAK,J.

JULY 10,2018 Bisht r