Neelam Rajput v. Union Of India & ORS

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 547/2017, CAV 741/2017, CM APPL.29674/2017 NEELAM RAJPUT ..... Appellant Through: Dr. K.S. Chauhan with Mr. Murari Lal, Mr. Ajit Kr. Ekka and Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for R-3, 4 & 5. Mr. Anil Panwar, Advocate for R-1&2.

Mr. Sangram Patnaik with Mr. Dhrubajit Saikia, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 21.08.2017 We are of the opinion that interference with the impugned order which declines interim relief is not warranted in the circumstances of the case. However, it will be open to the appellant to apply for hearing of the petition having regard to her retirement from service. In such a case, the Single Judge may consider the request for expedited hearing on its merits. The appeal is accordingly disposed of along with pending applications.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SUNIL GAUR, J AUGUST 21, 2017/vikas/