Manoj v. State

$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MANOJ ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Rajneesh, proxy counsel for Mr.Biswajit Patra, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, A.S.C. for the State with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv.

with Inspector Narender Singh, SHO PS Kalyan Puri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 11.02.2016 1.

By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Petitioner is seeking parole for a period of two months on the ground of constructing house on his share of ancestral property, arranging money for same, getting admission of his daughter in reputed school and reconnecting social ties with the family and society. 2.

Status report has been filed by the State verifying the address of the Petitioner to be correct.

3.

The Petitioner had made representation to the Respondent/State praying for grant of parole which has been rejected by the Respondent vide order No.F.18/157/2010/HG/1959 dated 1st May, 2015. 4.

The petitioner is seeking parole for maintaining social ties. That as per

Parole/Furlough Guidelines 2010, one of the objectives of framing the said guidelines was 'to protect social ties'. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for grant of parole to the Petitioner to enable him to reconnect social ties.

5.

On behalf of State, it is submitted that appropriate order may be passed keeping in view Parole/Furlough Guidelines-2010 issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. 6.

As per nominal roll, the overall jail conduct of the Petitioner as well as jail conduct in last one year is mentioned as 'Satisfactory'. 7.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for grant of parole is allowed to the extent that the Petitioner is granted parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent and subject to the following conditions:- (i) Since the petitioner is being granted parole for the purpose of reestablishing social ties and he is permanent resident of Village Nithari, Near Chola Chowki, Post-Vair, PS-Kotwali Dehat, Teh.-Sikanderabad, DistrictBulandshar (U.P.), the Petitioner shall keep the SHO/Duty Officer, P.S. Kalyan Puri, Delhi informed about his place of residence in Delhi as well as his place of residence in his native town and his contact numbers i.e.

mobile, landline or both. He shall further inform the SHO/Duty Officer, P.S. Kalyan Puri, Delhi as to the period for which he shall be staying in his native town.

town.

(iii) While submitting the bail bond, he will furnish to the Jail Superintendent the address and the contact numbers of the place where he would reside in Delhi and in his native place i.e. Village Nithari, Near Chola Chowki, Post-Vair, PS-Kotwali Dehat, Teh.-Sikanderabad, DistrictBulandshar (U.P.) during the period of parole. 8.

It is, however, made clear that on expiry of the parole period, the Petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent, who shall submit the surrender report to this Court. 9.

Writ Petition stands allowed in the above terms. 10.

The Petitioner be informed through the Jail Superintendent about the order passed.

Order dasti.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

FEBRUARY 11, 2016 'pg'