Kalindee Rail Nirman v. Union Of India

$~5 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6789/2017 & CM APPLs. 28273-28274/2017 KALINDEE RAIL NIRMAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vijender Kumar and Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jagjit Singh and Mr. Preet Singh, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 31.08.2017 During the course of hearing, Mr. Jagjit Singh, ld. counsel for the respondent submits that in view of the arbitration clause forming part of the subject contract, the petitioner is at liberty to invoke the arbitration clause in accordance with law and any of the claims and the contentions of the petitioner may be raked-up during the arbitral proceedings including the issue of termination, which shall be gone into by the Arbitral Tribunal.

In view of the foregoing, ld. counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition to invoke the arbitration clause in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed. Interim order stands vacated.

A. K. CHAWLA, J AUGUST 31, 2017 rc