Sachin Kumar & ORS. v. State & ORS.

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3073/2017 & Crl.M.A. 12720/2017 SACHIN KUMAR & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Nitin Arora, Advocate with all three petitioners in person.

versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP for State with SI Mehrab Alam, PS Nabi Karim.

Respondents No.2 and 3 are in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 09.08.2017 The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No.10/2011 registered under Section 324/34 IPC at PS Nabi Karim, New Delhi, on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that a compromise/settlement has been arrived at between the parties in the matter. Respondents No.2 and 3 are present in Court today and are identified by the Investigating Officer. They state that they have settled the matter with the petitioners with their own free will and choice without any threat, pressure and coercion as per Compromise Deed dated 13.07.2017. They further submit that they do not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

Statements of the parties have been recorded separately. CRL.M.C. 3073/2017

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences voluntarily and out of their own free will and without any coercion, pressure, and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings. It would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No.10/2011 registered under Section 324/34 IPC at PS Nabi Karim, New Delhi, and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of.

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J AUGUST 09, 2017 afa CRL.M.C. 3073/2017