Sanjay Dass v. State

29# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 19/2017 SANJAY DASS ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Counsel (appearance not given) for Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 05.05.2017 Crl. M.A. No. 7540/2017 (modification of order dated 27th March, 2017) 1.

By this application the petitioner seeks modification of order dated 27th March, 2017 granting him parole for a period of four weeks on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹25,000/- with one surety of the like amount.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends and has also placed on record copies of earlier orders passed by this Court wherein the petitioner was directed to be released on cash surety of ₹10,000/- on both occasions. 3.

Considering the fact that earlier the surety bond directed to be furnished by the petitioner was cash security of ₹10,000/- and the petitioner did not misuse the concession and surrendered in time, the order dated 27th March, 2017 is modified.

W.P.(CRL) 19/2017

4.

The petitioner be now released on parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/- with one surety which may be a cash security of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, further subject to the condition that the petitioner will surrender to custody, after expiry of the period of parole.

5.

Application is disposed of.

6.

Copy of the order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MAY 05, 2017 'vn'

W.P.(CRL) 19/2017