Ramesh Jain v. Veena Gupta

$~16 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RC.Rev.406/2017 RAMESH JAIN ..... Appellant Through:

Mr. Yogesh Pachauri, Adv.

(Mobile No.9811895298).

versus VEENA GUPTA ..... Respondent Through:

none.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 28.09.2018 CM No.40391/2018 1.

This application is dismissed inasmuch as once there is a consent order and the compromise between the parties disposing of a petition by giving time to vacate, thereafter, by unilateral application time cannot be extended, and this is all the more so because the appellant already has enjoyed the benefit of a period of one year from passing of the consent/compromise order dated 4th September, 2017. CM is dismissed.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2018 aruna