Shyam Pal v. State & ANR.

$25 & 26 * IN THE HIG11 COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4647/2016 MAA SARAS WATT MOTORS Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Honey Khanna, Mr.

Urnang Kumar Singh, Advs.

veI.s us STATE & ANR.

Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP.

+ CRL.M.C. 4848/2016 SHYAM PAl Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Honey Khanna, Mr.

Umang Kumar Singh, Advs.

versus STATE & ANR.

Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 0 R I) E R % 15.03.2017 Despite pass over, none is present on behalf of respondent No.2 though served.

Learned counsel fbr the petitioner submits that as noted in the order dated 231 December, 2016 now notice in the appeal has been issued to respondent No.2 b\ learned Additional Sessions Judge. Since the appeal is yet to be decided, the present petitions can be disposed of by suspending the sentence of Shyam Pal as proprietor of the firm Maa Saraswati Motors and in his own capacity during pendency of the appeal before the learned Additional Sessions Judge on the same terms and conditions as imposed vide order dated 18t1 November, 2016 passed by By:AMULYA

learned Metropolitan Magistrate. Ordered accordingly. Petitions and applications are disposed of.

Order dasti.

;I r I MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MARCH 15, 2017 'v mittal'