Amit Sikka v. State

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1569/2017 AMIT SIKKA ..... Petitioner Through:

Petitioner in person.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with Inspector raj Bala from PS-South Rohini.

Mr.Arun Kr. Singh, Advocate for complainant/objector.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 04.12.2017 On the last date of hearing, the statement of the parties was recorded. Counsel for the complainant submits that all disputes/claims have been settled and payments have been made in terms of Settlement Deed. In view of submissions made and compromise arrived at between the parties, the present petition is disposed of. SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J DECEMBER 04, 2017/ssc