Amit Arora v. High Court Of Delhi Through Registrar General

$~22 to 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M. APPL.40679/2017 IN W.P.(C) 2723/2017 SHITU NAGPAL ..... Petitioner versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent + C.M. APPL.40697/2017 IN W.P.(C) 2976/2017 SAPNA SETHI ..... Petitioner versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL ..... Respondent + C.M. APPL.40680/2017 IN W.P.(C) 4156/2017 VIPIN KUMAR RAI ..... Petitioner versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent + C.M. APPL.40683/2017 IN W.P.(C) 4159/2017 SUNIL ..... Petitioner versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent + C.M. APPL.40678/2017 IN W.P.(C) 4167/2017 SREERAM L.

..... Petitioner versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent + C.M. APPL.40684/2017 IN W.P.(C) 4260/2017 DURGESH NANDAN ..... Petitioner versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent + C.M. APPL.40681/2017 IN W.P.(C) 7004/2017 AMIT ARORA ..... Petitioner versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL ..... Respondent

Through : Sh. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Nisha, Advocates, for petitioner/applicant in Item No.23. Dr. Amit George, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item Nos. 24 to 26.

Ms. Arunabha Ganguli, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.27.

Sh. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.28.

Sh. Sanjoy Ghose, Sh. Dhanan Jai Rana and Sh. Rishabh Jetly, Advocates, for DHC, in Item Nos. 22 to 28.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

O R D E R

% 10.11.2017 Learned counsel for the Delhi High Court submits that the follow-up action on the Committee's recommendation pursuant to the order of this Court would be taken; he seeks accommodation for two weeks.

List on 04.12.2017.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J C. HARI SHANKAR, J NOVEMBER 10, 2017/AJK