Vijay @ Bintu & ORS v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5021/2018 VIJAY @ BINTU & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Manish Kumar & Mr.

Shaurya Dawar, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP with SI Kuldeep Singh, PS:Palam Village, Delhi Ms. Lata Anand, Advocate for respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 30.09.2019 1.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.326/2015, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟), registered at P.S.: Palam Village, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 2.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as their respective counsel submitted that the parties have settled their disputes on their own free will, without any force or coercion before the Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi on 2.4.2016. It is also submitted that the marriage between the petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 has been dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage

Act, 1955 vide a decree of divorce dated 2.2.2017. 3.

Respondent No.2, who is present in Court with her mother, has reiterated the aforesaid facts and submitted that since the matter stands settled and nothing is due and payable to her from the petitioners, she has no objection to the petition being allowed and the FIR being quashed.

4.

The Investigating Officer („IO‟), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement.

5.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No.326/2015, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Palam Village, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 6.

Petition is disposed of in above terms.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 tp